Miracast windows 10 lag 1080p#
Main PC Display output: Obscure Soniq 32inch 1080p TV (via HDMI 60hz) Motherboard: ASUS ROG STRIX B450-I GamingĬPU: AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF (Stock Clocks, No Undervolt) Windows such as Edge browser windows can be dragged into second display area and is still interactable, just not displaying properly due to green pure green screen.Īs far as my searches go on google and on the subreddit, I haven't found a similar case so I was wondering what may be the problem here. However, laptop displays only green screen. Laptop screen shows up correctly on connect panel, connects successfully. Posted on r/AMD Q3'20 Tech Support Megathread, reposted on r/AMDHelp and here for more exposureĪttempted to use Windows 10's built in wireless display casting feature (Miracast) to connect Ryzen+Radeon based PC to Intel+Nvidia based laptop to use as second screen. We've been able to establish Miracast sessions for hours without dropping, lag or artifacting most of the time.First time posting here, so apologies if I'm doing this wrong. There are other issues with Miracast, namely the Action Center crapping out every now and then but so far it's been decent from my experience.
I've decided not to deploy this feature at work yet because we have been able to get Miracast using peer-to-peer reasonably reliable by tweaking our wifi channel plan. This should in theory make it more reliable: In 1703 they added this feature I think called Infracast which negotiates the miracast connection over the peer-to-peer connection BUT pushes the mirroring session over your wireless or wired LAN once established. AirPlay and Chromecast both use your existing wireless or wired LAN network so the assumption made there is that your own infrastructure network should inherently be more reliable. This *should* work well if you live in a suburban area away from wireless interference but it is compounded by the fact that most routers nowadays are doing things like channel bonding and 2.4ghz is notoriously unstable. WiDi establishes a peer-to-peer wireless network for the mirroring session. The problem with Miracast is that it is built upon Intel WiFi-Direct. I live in a condo in Chicago and have tons of wireless networks around me. These are enterprise grade and allows us to manage them centrally and tweak their wireless config in ways we didn’t realize the Miracast/WiFi-Direct protocol supported. We’ve since moved on from the Microsoft wireless display adapters to the Actiontec ScreenBeam 960.
Miracast windows 10 lag driver#
I moved our home network to 5ghz years ago because of issues with netflix and hulu streaming on 2.4ghz.Ģ) Have you updated the firmware on the miracast adapter itself? That helped tremendously, there’s a firmware updater tool for it in the Microsoft Store.ģ) We’re mostly Surface so updating to the latest driver and firmware bundles from MS also helped make it more reliable.Ĥ) More recent builds of Windows also made it more reliable. With newer builds of Windows it has become more reliable (we’re currently using 1803 in our environment).ġ) Is your wireless network 2.4ghz or 5ghz? Miracast works best on 5ghz spectrum as there are more wireless channels to play with so there would be less chance for co-channel interference.
There are still some issues with Windows action center itself not wanting to connect but that is usually resolved by a Windows reboot or logoff/logon. We had to tweak our network configuration to avoid wireless co-channel interference and they have been pretty reliable since then. Disconnected all the time, or would refuse to connect or would become pixelated and laggy. When we initially got them, we just threw them in thinking they would just be plug and play… and they were a trainwreck. We use about 60 Miracast devices at work and have been mostly successful with them. I’ve been listening to FRD for a while now and hearing all of the issues Brad has been having with Miracast and thought maybe I could belp.